Adviser vs. Commander
evasconcellos
2011-03-15
I’m getting closer to something concrete – Not only did I find an email conversation between Commander Lockhart and Special Adviser Strickland, but I now have evidence of excessive force being employed. That said, it’s not clear what this excessive force is being used for – I just can’t tell whether it’s against civilians, or something more sinister. Either way, Strickland and Hargreave want survivors. I don’t know what “Subject Prophet” and “Nanosuit” are, but it sounds like something far larger is going on here and I find that a bit frightening. I think I'm on the verge of something huge - I'll keep digging.
-Skyline
From: Special Adviser Tara Strickland
To: Site Commander Lockhart, Manhattan Crisis Zone
Cc: C.E.L.L. Oversight Secretariat
Commander Lockhart,
May I remind you, sir, that in the case of Subject Prophet and Nanosuit v2, Jacob Hargreave’s instructions are explicit. Prophet is to be captured alive and the nano-suit is to be damaged as little as possible in the process. I am merely conveying these instructions to your men where their comportment does not serve those ends.
Further to this, I submit that since the failure of evacuation and the lockdown, your troops have grown increasingly unprofessional and trigger-happy in their duties. This is a matter of some concern to both myself and Mr Hargreave, and, I would imagine, to the Oversight Secretariat as well.
T. Strickland
From: Site Commander D. Lockhart, Manhattan Crisis Zone
To: Special Adviser Tara Strickland
Cc: C.E.L.L. Oversight Secretariat
Ms Strickland
I have today received word from several of my officers that you are interfering in their management of the crisis zone; specifically that you are countermanding my orders where shoot-to-kill policy is concerned.
You will cease to do so immediately.
Dominic H. Lockhart (Cmdr)
